Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Blog 5: Altered Assumptions in Jazz

Pick one thing/issue in the Miles Davis Autobiography and use it to answer a broader question: What were your assumptions about jazz and its history coming into the
course?
How have those assumptions been changed, revised or reinforced by what you have learned in this course? 

Coming into this course, I knew very little about jazz and even less about its history. Although I was familiar with certain artists by their names (Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, Frank Sinatra, etc.) I did not know anything about their music or where it came from. I did have the feeling that jazz was more of a community event than a performance, but did not know of any solid evidence to back this up. I knew that it originated as a “Negro music,” much like blues did, and figured that it kept the community close during hard times. I did not, however, have any idea of the magnitude and influence that it would have on America. I figured that its growth was based on teamwork and encouragement—in this regard I was partially wrong. While bands did work together, encouraging each other well, a common strategy of music teachers was to be extremely hard on their pupils.

Jazz music originated as the blending of musical cultures around the turn of the twentieth century in New Orleans. Over the next fifty years, jazz grew into a culture itself. I was fully unaware of the magnitude of this culture and its influence on America. I had only previously assumed that it was simply a musical genre, used solely for entertainment purposes. This course has demonstrated thoroughly that jazz helped spark a cultural revolution in America that eventually became The Civil Rights Movement. Jazz became a way for African Americans to show racist whites that they could be geniuses too, and that they had value to give society. It became an easy way for them to become integrated into white society. At the same time, it gave them an excellent community event that could separate people from violence and destruction, such as in San Juan Hill and Leimert Park. In all of these regards, I was mostly ignorant but had the right idea, and this class gave me more insight to reinforce my blind assumptions.

One assumption that this course has completely transformed was the mode of teaching that most jazz teachers employed. In everything that I have been taught—piano, guitar, gymnastics, water polo, even school—I have always been encouraged and told, “you can do it! You have the potential!” Even if I was performing horribly, someone would tell me, “it just takes practice, you’ll get it eventually.” These experiences have made me assume that this is the way that teaching is everywhere, and with everything. When considering jazz, however, this is simply not the case. Miles Davis exemplifies this repeatedly in his autobiography. Beginning in his early years his teachers would tell him he was the worst musician that they had ever heard. “Maybe Gus [trumpet teacher] thought that by telling me I was his worst student that I would play harder.” (Davis, 35) This was not how it always worked—in high school, Davis received encouragement from his fellow band mates. (Davis, 32) However, the sort of ‘negative encouragement’ he received from Gus transformed into blunt truth when Davis began to play in the real world. In the underground jazz clubs of New York, if a performing musician was good, he was encouraged. If he didn’t impress, then he would be heavily discouraged. “If you got up on the bandstand at Minton’s and couldn’t play, you were not only going to get embarrassed by people ignoring you or booing you, you might get your ass kicked.” This tactic is so alien to me that I couldn’t have conceived it before taking this class.


After studying jazz for two and a half months, I have realized that while some of my prior assumptions were based in truth, others were entirely wrong. Jazz is a community event, a blending of cultures, and has had an enormous impact on American society. Among themselves, jazz artists use tactics of both positive and negative encouragement, and aren’t afraid to tell each other if they are playing horribly. I have learned a lot, and my perception of jazz has been transformed into a more accurate idea, with interesting history to back it up.

1 comment:

  1. I really enjoyed reading about how your blind assumptions about the nature of jazz and its origins were reinforced throughout this course. I thought you did a great job articulating the nuances of your discoveries and how you felt about them. Most interesting to me was your take on how jazz was taught. As someone who has never received any formal jazz training, it was engaging to read from the perspective of a musician. It's an interesting take on shared material that I hadn't considered before. Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete